<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times and obfuscating links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Financial-Times &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Financial Times to make content free in online advertising move</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial-Times &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Financial Times to make content free in online advertising move</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Financial Times and Unethical SEOHigh up in site explorer backlink set for uSwicth and in third position appears the Financial Times, http://wwww.ft.com. So at this point my interest is piqued. Why would the homepage for the Financial Times link to uSwitch? (more…) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Financial Times and Unethical SEOHigh up in site explorer backlink set for uSwicth and in third position appears the Financial Times, <a href="http://wwww.ft.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/wwww.ft.com');" rel="nofollow">http://wwww.ft.com</a>. So at this point my interest is piqued. Why would the homepage for the Financial Times link to uSwitch? (more…) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conseoquences</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>conseoquences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>hmm. Just had a look and it seems that all mention of uSwitch and 'telephone' has vanished from the source code - and its not in the drop down anymore. they must have removed it. Do you think we could get them to do the same to money supermarket - there again judging by the query strings at the end of the URLs more likely they're trying to make money by directing traffic onto the moneysupermarket site itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm. Just had a look and it seems that all mention of uSwitch and &#8216;telephone&#8217; has vanished from the source code - and its not in the drop down anymore. they must have removed it. Do you think we could get them to do the same to money supermarket - there again judging by the query strings at the end of the URLs more likely they&#8217;re trying to make money by directing traffic onto the moneysupermarket site itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Freebies and Marketing Ideas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Financial Times and Unethical SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Freebies and Marketing Ideas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Financial Times and Unethical SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2007/10/10/financial-times-and-unethical-seo/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Mercury Thread wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Financial Times and Unethical SEO&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mercury Thread wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Financial Times and Unethical SEO&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
