The Gmail Grimace

Posted by Mercury Thread | Posted in Email Marketing, Firefox, Google | Posted on 28-03-2008

0

I was just chatting to Nick Duddy @ Equator and he was telling me about the ‘Gmail Grimace‘ thing going on over at the Email Standards Project. I’ve recently been getting more and more into Email Marketing as a way to generate sales and have been amazed at the difficulties that email marketers are having with different mail clients have with emails (think IE Vs Firefox web design problems on a far larger scale and your probably still not close to the problems they can have). Can you imagine having to do all your styles inline and design in tables – its so retro.
They even have a gmail Grimace Flickr Group – which is cool. At last something on Flickr which actually interested me!

Real Internet Marketers are members of Fight Club

Posted by Mercury Thread | Posted in IMJUK, Internet Marketing | Posted on 27-03-2008

11

The first rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.

The second rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.

The third rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.

Are you a member of Fight Club?

So you want to make money online. Well it’s like being in Fight Club. You spend all day looking for things that are going to make you money. Niches here, niches there, you test, you refine and you start making money. The one thing is you dont tell anyone how you actually did it.

Every so often someone will break ranks and start telling everyone online how they used exactly the same tactics as you did to start making some money and everyone is doing it and all of a sudden that whole chapter of Fight Club needs to be closed down and replaced with a new, stronger Fight Club.

Remember the first rule of Internet Marketing fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.

Google Analytics – Google Image Search Traffic

Posted by Mercury Thread | Posted in Google Analytics | Posted on 10-03-2008

3

Over the weekend I started to see a spike in traffic one of my sites was receiving from Google Image Search in Google analytics. Unfortunately when I start to dig deeper into it I find that Google Analytics won’t show me what the queries were that drove all the traffic to the site.

I love Google analytics: its free, simple to install and can be up and running in minutes and tracking almost instantly. However these kind of little glitches that I find that drive me up the wall. surely the piece of code that extracts the query is almost the same as that used for the noraml search queries.

While trying to develop a solution I thought the bestplace to have a look would be through the blogosphere and start hacking through some blogs to ‘borrow’ a solution that someone else has came up with for this. Some of the solutions for tracking image search traffic through Google analytics look complicated – probably as my JavaScript skills are minimal.

The best solution looks to be that advocated by Joost DeValk. I’m away to test this out and see how it works. If anyone knows of a better way to do this can you let me know. Thanks is advance.

Natural Vs Unnatural Link Profiles in Link Development

Posted by Mercury Thread | Posted in IMJUK, SEO, SEO Research, Search Engine Optimization, Unethical Internet Marketing | Posted on 03-03-2008

3

I don’t need to go on about the importance of links in relation to your natural search positions. We all know that having great links leads to great positions.

One of the things that I’d heard could be affecting your natural search performance is whether these great links you’ve been out link baiting, link spamming or have been growing organically to your web sites is whether they created a link profile that was seen as ‘natural’ or ‘unnatural’. I’ve seen unnatural link profiles referred to as ‘artifical’. I prefer unnatural as you could develop an unnatural link profile without doing anything on purpose – artifical indicates to me, at least, that you’ve been actively going out of your way to get links.

Having a natural link profile is what every website apparently needs to consistently rank well for all of its appropriate search terms. Unnatural link patterns are suppossed to damge your search engine positions, at least in the short term.

I’ve been thinking about this ideas for a while and it seems logical. Unnatural linking = Spamming = penalty in the SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages).

Before I could go and test out this I had to define were natural and unnatural link profiles.

What is a ‘natural link’ profile?

A natural link profile is one that grows organically with no, or little, interference.

I believe that natural link prfoiles would have five defining components:

  1. Links likely to grow at a consistent rate
  2. The majority of links are on pages, within sites, on a related themes
  3. These pages would be unlikely to have high PageRank
  4. Links would often be within fresh content
  5. Links would often be in non-duplicate content

I know these rules are subjective but I felt they could be used as a way to use a system of trigger level penalties: when your link profile displays an unnatural level of any of these the penalty starts to interact with your rankings.

  • Links could grow dramatically to your domain – but these links could be natural if they were to a page about a hot topic. So there would be a trigger point inside the search engine algorithm to give leeway for this.
  • It is likely that not all links would be on topic, nor should they ever be – human variation in language etc would determine that some links would be seen as ‘off topic’ by a search engine. Espescially when you have a brand name that means nothing in itsel: I was thinking about Diageo or something similar.
  • Having exclusively links from high PageRank pages may indicate that you are operating within a hot topic again, or you could be spamming. The natural distribution curve for your website will be different from other websites but there may be points in time when your natural distribution changes drastically in terms of PageRank.

What is an ‘unnatural link’ profile?

If a natural link profile conforms to the rules above, but doesn’t need to obey all five at the same time. An unnatural link profile would be one where the rules of natural linking were broken often enough to trigger the filter(s).

This would be reasonably simple for a search engine to use as you could use threshhold trigger points within an algorithm to indicate when a website went from having a natural to an unnatural link proflile and vice versa, with various stages inbetween.

Testing Natural and Unnatural Link profiles

Base line test involved:

  1. Five domains
  2. All had been spidered for more than three months
  3. No keywords in the domain names
  4. All were .co.ukdomain extensions
  5. All hosted on the same server

I’ll be putting the test results in our next post. If you have any thoughts in advance of our publishing the results please let us know.