<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing Journal UK</title>
	<link>http://www.imjuk.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Get Google to Cache your Pages More Frequently</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/16/get-google-to-cache-your-pages-more-frequently/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/16/get-google-to-cache-your-pages-more-frequently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IMJUK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/16/get-google-to-cache-your-pages-more-frequently/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting your pages cached by Google can be a nightmare at times. You&#8217;ve updated a web page and then you sit back and wait, wait some more and after more waiting GoogleBot decides index and cache your updated web page. It&#8217;s a problem that Dunkin&#8217; Donuts had recently. They had a free iced coffee day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting your pages cached by <a href="http://www.google.co.uk" target="_blank">Google</a> can be a nightmare at times. You&#8217;ve updated a web page and then you sit back and wait, wait some more and after more waiting GoogleBot decides index and cache your updated web page. It&#8217;s a problem that Dunkin&#8217; Donuts had recently. They had a free iced coffee day in their branches put it on their website - but it was invisible in their search rankings as the page was not cached - <a href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/2008/05/15/dunkin-donuts-free-iced-coffee-campaign/trackback/" target="_blank">GrokDotCom have posted on this recently</a>.</p>
<p>Traditionally Google would index, and cache, your website based upon the number of links and the resulting PageRank of your webpages. Pages with more links and/or PageRank would be reindexed and cahced more frequently than pages with less links and/or PageRank.</p>
<p>It is possible to make changes to your website to help Google cache your website more often.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/16/get-google-to-cache-your-pages-more-frequently/#more-70" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/16/get-google-to-cache-your-pages-more-frequently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Analytics is Dead - Long Live IndexTools</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/13/google-analytics-is-dead-long-live-indextools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/13/google-analytics-is-dead-long-live-indextools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/13/google-analytics-is-dead-long-live-indextools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I&#8217;ve been reading over the last week or two it would appear that following  the puchase of IndexTools by Yahoo! IndexTools is going to be made free! Soon you should be able to get an enterprise analytics package for your website and for at the best price you&#8217;ll get online - absolutely nothing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve been reading over the last week or two it would appear that following  the puchase of <a href="http://www.indextools.com" target="_blank">IndexTools</a> by <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Yahoo!</a> IndexTools is going to be made free! Soon you should be able to get an enterprise analytics package for your website and for at the best price you&#8217;ll get online - absolutely nothing :p</p>
<h2>Is IndexTools better than Google Analytics?</h2>
<p>You bet. I&#8217;m a strong believer in <a href="http://www.omniture.com/" target="_blank">Omniture</a> (it&#8217;s fab &amp; when you plugin in some modules it rocks your online marketing world - if you havent seen <a href="http://www.omniture.com/en/products/conversion/testandtarget" target="_blank">Test&amp; Target</a> you&#8217;re in for a treat). Over at <a href="http://www.searchenginewatch.com" target="_blank">Search Engine Watch</a> they described the free IndexTools like getting <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080415-093431" target="_blank">80% of Omniture but free</a>. To me is this is true the difference we could all be seeing from our free analytics package could be vast.</p>
<h2>When can you sign up for your Free IndexTools?</h2>
<p>Ah the difficult question - and the truth is I have no idea. All the &#8216;<em>buzz</em>&#8216; seems to be about it happening. At present I can find no information on timescales.</p>
<p>If you know any more about release dates for the free IndexTools or have some comments to make let us know in the comments below. I am sure we&#8217;ll be talking more the free analytics war that&#8217;s building in the nesr future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/05/13/google-analytics-is-dead-long-live-indextools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woopra Web Analytics Invites</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/30/woopra-web-analytics-invites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/30/woopra-web-analytics-invites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[IMJUK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/30/woopra-web-analytics-invites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been hearing lots of good things about Woopra lately. It looks nice - from the screenshots I&#8217;ve seen. Unfortunately I&#8217;ve been waiting an absolute age to get ahold of an invite - its like the wait that happened for Google Analytics before they got their act together.
If anyone has a spare Woopra invite they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been hearing lots of good things about <a href="http://www.woopra.com" target="_blank">Woopra</a> lately. It looks nice - from the screenshots I&#8217;ve seen. Unfortunately I&#8217;ve been waiting an absolute age to get ahold of an invite - its like the wait that happened for <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/" target="_blank">Google Analytics</a> before they got their act together.</p>
<p>If anyone has a spare Woopra invite they could send us we&#8217;d be really grateful. If you could drop us a comment below if you&#8217;re able to help and I&#8217;ll email you back as soon as I get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/30/woopra-web-analytics-invites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Data Center Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/04/google-data-center-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/04/google-data-center-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/04/google-data-center-tools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Checking your SEO rankings in multiple data centres can be a useful thing to have a look at. Showing you how your rankings are in variuos Google data centres (DC)  at the same time. As Google does a rolling update of its data taking DC into and out of their active configuration to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checking your SEO rankings in multiple data centres can be a useful thing to have a look at. Showing you how your rankings are in variuos Google data centres (DC)  at the same time. As Google does a rolling update of its data taking DC into and out of their active configuration to be updated. Sometime the DC you&#8217;re getting info on isn&#8217;t using the most recent set of data. This is espescially useful when google are carrying out an algorithm update or during technology changes - as you can see the changes rolling out across DC.</p>
<h2>Google Data Center tools on the web</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.mcdar.net/dance/index.php" target="_blank">McDar</a> has traditioanlly been the palce to go and check out results. It allows you to check by IP block for results. I like the way the results are outputted but you can only check about 6 DC on one screen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/">Bill</a> just sent me a link to a new <a href="http://www.seocritique.com/datacentertool/" target="_blank">DC checking tool</a> - they need to do some work on the output of the results as they scroll down for about half a mile. But you get loads of differing DC checked at the on time.</p>
<p>If anyone knows of any other tools that do this job stick them in the comments below and I&#8217;ll have a squizz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/04/04/google-data-center-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gmail Grimace</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/28/the-gmail-grimace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/28/the-gmail-grimace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/28/the-gmail-grimace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just chatting to Nick Duddy @ Equator and he was telling me about the &#8216;Gmail Grimace&#8216; thing going on over at the Email Standards Project. I&#8217;ve recently been getting more and more into Email Marketing as a way to generate sales and have been amazed at the difficulties that email marketers are having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just chatting to <a href="http://equatorlive.com/blogs/duddus/" target="_blank">Nick Duddy</a> @ Equator and he was telling me about the &#8216;<a href="http://www.email-standards.org/blog/entry/getting-some-gmail-attention/" target="_blank">Gmail Grimace</a>&#8216; thing going on over at the Email Standards Project. I&#8217;ve recently been getting more and more into Email Marketing as a way to generate sales and have been amazed at the difficulties that email marketers are having with different mail clients have with emails (think <a href="www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx" target="_blank">IE</a> Vs <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/" target="_blank">Firefox</a> web design problems on a far larger scale and your probably still not close to the problems they can have). Can you imagine having to do all your styles inline and design in tables - its so retro.<br />
They even have a gmail <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/project-gmail-grimace/" target="_blank">Grimace Flickr Group</a> - which is cool. At last something on <a href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> which actually interested me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/28/the-gmail-grimace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Internet Marketers are members of Fight Club</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/27/real-internet-marketers-are-members-of-fight-club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/27/real-internet-marketers-are-members-of-fight-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[IMJUK]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/27/real-internet-marketers-are-members-of-fight-club/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.
The second rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.
The third rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.
Are you a member of Fight Club?
So you want to make money online. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.</p>
<p>The second rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.</p>
<p>The third rule of fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.</p>
<h2>Are you a member of Fight Club?</h2>
<p>So you want to make money online. Well it&#8217;s like being in Fight Club. You spend all day looking for things that are going to make you money. Niches here, niches there, you test, you refine and you start making money. The one thing is you dont tell anyone how you actually did it.</p>
<p>Every so often someone will break ranks and start telling everyone online how they used exactly the same tactics as you did to start making some money and everyone is doing it and all of a sudden that whole chapter of Fight Club needs to be closed down and replaced with a new, stronger Fight Club.</p>
<p>Remember the first rule of Internet Marketing fight club is that you must not talk about fight club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/27/real-internet-marketers-are-members-of-fight-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Analytics - Google Image Search Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/10/google-analytics-google-image-search-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/10/google-analytics-google-image-search-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/10/google-analytics-google-image-search-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend I started to see a spike in traffic one of my sites was receiving from Google Image Search in Google analytics. Unfortunately when I start to dig deeper into it I find that Google Analytics won&#8217;t show me what the queries were that drove all the traffic to the site.
I love Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend I started to see a spike in traffic one of my sites was receiving from Google Image Search in Google analytics. Unfortunately when I start to dig deeper into it I find that Google Analytics won&#8217;t show me what the queries were that drove all the traffic to the site.</p>
<p>I love Google analytics: its free, simple to install and can be up and running in minutes and tracking almost instantly. However these kind of little glitches that I find that drive me up the wall. surely the piece of code that extracts the query is almost the same as that used for the noraml search queries.</p>
<p>While trying to develop a solution I thought the bestplace to have a look would be through the blogosphere and start hacking through some blogs to &#8216;borrow&#8217; a solution that someone else has came up with for this. Some of the solutions for tracking image search traffic through Google analytics look complicated - probably as my JavaScript skills are minimal.</p>
<p>The best solution looks to be that advocated by <a href="http://www.joostdevalk.nl/google-analytics-and-google-image-search-revisited/" target="_blank">Joost DeValk</a>. I&#8217;m away to test this out and see how it works. If anyone knows of a better way to do this can you let me know. Thanks is advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/10/google-analytics-google-image-search-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Vs Unnatural Link Profiles in Link Development</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/03/natural-vs-unnatural-link-profiles-in-link-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/03/natural-vs-unnatural-link-profiles-in-link-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unethical Internet Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IMJUK]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/03/natural-vs-unnatural-link-profiles-in-link-development/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t need to go on about the importance of links in relation to your natural search positions. We all know that having great links leads to great positions.
One of the things that I&#8217;d heard could be affecting your natural search performance is whether these great links you&#8217;ve been out link baiting, link spamming or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t need to go on about the importance of links in relation to your natural search positions. We all know that having great links leads to great positions.</p>
<p>One of the things that I&#8217;d heard could be affecting your natural search performance is whether these great links you&#8217;ve been out link baiting, link spamming or have been growing organically to your web sites is whether they created a link profile that was seen as &#8216;natural&#8217; or &#8216;unnatural&#8217;. I&#8217;ve seen unnatural link profiles referred to as &#8216;artifical&#8217;. I prefer unnatural as you could develop an unnatural link profile without doing anything on purpose - artifical indicates to me, at least, that you&#8217;ve been actively going out of your way to get links.</p>
<p>Having a natural link profile is what every website apparently needs to consistently rank well for all of its appropriate search terms. Unnatural link patterns  are suppossed to damge your search engine positions, at least in the short term.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about this ideas for a while and it seems logical. Unnatural linking = Spamming = penalty in the SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages).</p>
<p>Before I could go and test out this I had to define were natural and unnatural link profiles.</p>
<h2>What is a &#8216;natural link&#8217; profile?</h2>
<p>A natural link profile is one that grows organically with no, or little, interference.</p>
<p>I believe that natural link prfoiles would have five defining components:</p>
<ol>
<li>Links likely to grow at a consistent rate</li>
<li>The majority of links are on pages, within sites, on a related themes</li>
<li>These pages would be unlikely to have high PageRank</li>
<li>Links would often be within fresh content</li>
<li>Links would often be in non-duplicate content</li>
</ol>
<p>I know these rules are subjective but I felt they could be used as a way to use a system of trigger level penalties: when your link profile displays an unnatural level of any of these the penalty starts to interact with your rankings.</p>
<ul>
<li>Links could grow dramatically to your domain - but these links could be natural if they were to a page about a hot topic. So there would be a trigger point inside the search engine algorithm to give leeway for this.</li>
<li>It is likely that not all links would be on topic, nor should they ever be - human variation in language etc would determine that some links would be seen as &#8216;off topic&#8217; by a search engine. Espescially when you have a brand name that means nothing in itsel: I was thinking about Diageo or something similar.</li>
<li>Having exclusively links from high PageRank pages may indicate that you are operating within a hot topic again, or you could be spamming. The natural distribution curve for your website will be different from other websites but there may be points in time when your natural distribution changes drastically in terms of PageRank.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What is an &#8216;unnatural link&#8217; profile?</h2>
<p>If a natural link profile conforms to the rules above, but doesn&#8217;t need to obey all five at the same time. An unnatural link profile would be one where the rules of natural linking were broken often enough to trigger the filter(s).</p>
<p>This would be reasonably simple for a search engine to use as you could use threshhold trigger points within an algorithm to indicate when a website went from having a natural to an unnatural link proflile and vice versa, with various stages inbetween.</p>
<h2>Testing Natural and Unnatural Link profiles</h2>
<p>Base line test involved:</p>
<ol>
<li>Five domains</li>
<li>All had been spidered for more than three months</li>
<li>No keywords in the domain names</li>
<li>All were .co.ukdomain extensions</li>
<li>All hosted on the same server</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ll be putting the test results  in our next post. If you have any thoughts in advance of our publishing the results please let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/03/03/natural-vs-unnatural-link-profiles-in-link-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting your WordPress Blog from Hackers</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/25/protecting-your-wordpress-blog-from-hackers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/25/protecting-your-wordpress-blog-from-hackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs (we like)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/25/protecting-your-wordpress-blog-from-hackers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been reading quite  a bit lately about peoples WordPress blogs being targetted by everything from Malware Redirects to BlogRoll Spam. I thought I&#8217;d stick in some bits and pieces to help you get your WordPress blog toughened up and make your blogging safe. If you have a bog hosted over at wordpress.com rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading quite  a bit lately about peoples WordPress blogs being targetted by everything from <a href="http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/blog/seo-blogs/when-getting-hacked-hits-your-rankings.php/trackback/" title="SpiderWritingSEO articles" target="_blank">Malware Redirects</a> to BlogRoll Spam. I thought I&#8217;d stick in some bits and pieces to help you get your WordPress blog toughened up and make your blogging safe. If you have a bog hosted over at wordpress.com rather than your own install you&#8217;ll probably never have to worry about these things too much - you lucky people :p</p>
<ol>
<li> Keep checking in @ <a href="http://blogsecurity.net/" target="_blank">Blog Security</a>: They&#8217;ve been doing some great work on keeping the community updated on security exploits with WordPress. Subscribe to their RSS feed - it&#8217;s well worth it. They even have stuff on <a href="http://blogsecurity.net/wordpress/wordpress-mu-133-security-release/" target="_blank">WordPress Mu updates</a> - which is fab.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/three-tips-to-protect-your-wordpress-installation/trackback/" target="_blank">Matt Cutts posted about toughening your WordPress blog</a>: the bit about using empty index files can be hughely important as I&#8217;ve seen requests for this file going up quite a bit on some blogs lately from some strange IP addresses.</li>
<li> There are also <a href="http://www.noupe.com/how-tos/wordpress-security-tips-and-hacks.html/trackback" target="_blank">ten tips over at noupe.com</a>. Some don&#8217;t always work (I have some Plesk and some CPanel servers which exhibit different behaviours when trying some of these out.)</li>
</ol>
<p>Hope that helps all you WordPress addicts get a WordPress installation thats a better, and safer, than ever before.</p>
<p>If you know any other tips/tricks/etc that I could be using drop em a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/25/protecting-your-wordpress-blog-from-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Widgets Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/21/facebook-widgets-tutorial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/21/facebook-widgets-tutorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mercury Thread</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/21/facebook-widgets-tutorial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a plea to anyone who can help us here. We&#8217;re looking at building a Facebook widget - purely for vanity. We&#8217;ve had a look through the web and found various video tutorials about developing these but so far I&#8217;ve not been able to find one which has a step by steo guide for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a plea to anyone who can help us here. We&#8217;re looking at building a Facebook widget - purely for vanity. We&#8217;ve had a look through the web and found various video tutorials about developing these but so far I&#8217;ve not been able to find one which has a step by steo guide for techy folk on how to build these. Its going to involve parsing an RSS feed at some point.</p>
<p>Some of the applications I&#8217;ve seen online seem to build them for you - but they dont really offer us the flexibility we&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>If anyone knows of any good Facebook tutorials, guides or walkthroughs drop us a comment below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imjuk.com/2008/02/21/facebook-widgets-tutorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
